Viewpoint: The Art of Badmouthing Good Jobs News

// Last updated on //

If there’s one thing that Americans for Prosperity won’t tolerate, it’s prosperity. That was the message from the group’s leader following this morning’s economic news: a better-than-expected employment report, and the upward revision of figures for the prior two months. “Reckless spending, higher debt, and ever-higher taxes are not helping Americans get back to work,” roared Tim Phillips, president of AFP. That would be news, of course, to the 171,000 people who started picking up paychecks last month. But the AFP, which is an anti-Obama — to say the least — antigovernment, Ayn Rand/Friedrich Hayek-flavored advocacy group, is having none of it. This job growth is bad because it’s not their kind of job growth, even though it is: All of the growth came from the private sector; governments shed jobs. (MORE: The U.S. Economy Adds 171,000 Jobs in October, but Challenges Remain) The Chamber of Commerce, which represents the nation’s employers, isn’t all that thrilled either. “The 171,000 net new jobs created last month were unanticipated, but we shouldn’t be fooled by this number,” said America’s bosses. You mean, fooled into thinking that 171,000 new jobs is worse than not having 171,000 new jobs? And furthermore, the Chamber pointed out, “for people remaining in the workforce average hourly earnings went down.” Might we suggest that the Chamber’s members have something to do with the wage figure? You want to help, give your workers a raise. As economists without an ax to grind have explained, today’s number is more evidence that job recovery from the financial meltdown is going to drag on for years. The figure has to go north of 200,000 a month to get unemployment nearer to the 6% rate that used to be considered “full employment.” Instead, the slow/middling/steadily-improving (pick your adjective based on your politics) job growth environment is what happens when an unprecedented economic collapse meets unprecedented structural change in the economy. As my colleague and co-writer Rana Foroohar explained in a TIME cover story earlier this year, since 1990 post-recession job recovery has been stretching out well beyond the historical

Visit Original Source

Facebook Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.